Need, demand & relevance
Assess the problem, intended users, service gaps, demand, alternatives and the evidence supporting the proposed intervention or investment concept.
Gesem supports organisations that need a structured assessment of whether a proposed programme, service, institutional initiative or investment concept is needed, workable and implementable in Ethiopia. We combine evidence review, stakeholder consultation, field research and operational analysis to help clients compare options, identify risks and make better-informed decisions.
A useful feasibility study should move beyond describing a problem. It should test demand, delivery conditions, institutional readiness, costs, risks and realistic implementation choices.
Assess the problem, intended users, service gaps, demand, alternatives and the evidence supporting the proposed intervention or investment concept.
Examine geography, delivery channels, logistics, staffing, infrastructure, access, sequencing and implementation conditions that determine whether the concept can work in practice.
Review mandates, governance, organisational capacity, roles, coordination arrangements and systems needed to implement and sustain the proposed initiative.
Assess market structure, demand, affordability, value-chain conditions, cost drivers and economic implications at a level appropriate to the assignment.
Identify material operational, social, environmental, ethical, regulatory and contextual risks and define practical mitigation measures.
Compare realistic alternatives and translate the evidence into a recommended option, implementation roadmap, assumptions and decision points.
Clarify the proposed concept, decision to be made, alternative options, target groups, decision criteria and technical boundaries.
Analyse relevant documents, policy and regulatory context, existing studies, market or service data and implementation experience.
Use interviews, surveys, focus groups, observation, market checks or institutional assessment where primary evidence is needed.
Assess operational, institutional, market, financial/economic, social, environmental and risk dimensions appropriate to the scope.
Make trade-offs visible, identify assumptions and constraints, and compare feasible implementation pathways rather than presenting one predetermined solution.
Present a clear recommendation, implementation conditions, mitigation measures, indicative roadmap and issues requiring further specialist analysis.
Some feasibility assignments require engineering design, hydrology, architecture, specialist environmental modelling, legal opinions, actuarial analysis or investment-grade financial modelling. Gesem does not present these as in-house capabilities unless the required qualified specialists are explicitly included in the team. We define the technical boundary during inception and bring in appropriate expertise where the TOR requires it.
Yes. Gesem can assess need, demand, implementation conditions, institutional readiness, stakeholder perspectives, risks, options and practical delivery pathways for development and institutional initiatives.
Yes, at a level appropriate to the assignment. Where the TOR requires specialist investment modelling, valuation or regulated financial advice, suitably qualified specialists are included in the team.
Gesem can lead the wider research, institutional, socioeconomic, market and implementation components, but engineering design or certification is undertaken only with appropriately qualified technical professionals.
Yes. The findings can be translated into implementation options, results frameworks, risk mitigation, sequencing, resource assumptions and a subsequent programme or strategic-planning process.
Gesem can review the assignment and propose an appropriate Ethiopia methodology, team, work plan and commercial response.