Evidence for better decisions
Monitoring, evaluation and learning

Practical MEL systems and evaluations that improve decisions, accountability and learning.

Gesem Research and Consulting PLC supports NGOs, UN agencies, government institutions, civil society organisations and development partners with monitoring, evaluation and learning services that are rigorous, context-sensitive and useful for programme improvement. Our work connects credible evidence with management decisions, donor reporting, accountability to affected people and organisational learning.

Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning service by GRC
Service overview

How GRC supports this assignment area.

Strong monitoring and evaluation systems do more than count activities. They help programme teams understand whether interventions are reaching the right people, whether results are changing in the intended direction, why changes are happening, and what should be adapted. GRC designs MEL work around the decisions that clients need to make, not around a generic reporting template.

Our approach combines clear evaluation questions, appropriate indicators, feasible sampling, field-tested tools, digital data systems, qualitative inquiry, triangulation and user-friendly reporting. We give careful attention to gender equality, disability inclusion, conflict sensitivity, safeguarding, data protection and the ethical participation of communities.

Assignments can be delivered as independent evaluations or as technical support to strengthen internal MEL systems. Depending on the scope, GRC can provide the full cycle from inception and tool development to fieldwork, data analysis, validation and final presentation.

Our approach

A structured process from assignment design to use.

Each assignment is tailored, but the same discipline is applied: clarity of purpose, sound methods, careful field systems, transparent analysis and practical outputs.

01

Clarify the evidence need

We begin by confirming the purpose, intended users, evaluation questions, programme logic, reporting requirements and practical decisions the evidence should support.

02

Design a fit-for-purpose methodology

We develop a method mix that may include surveys, document review, KIIs, FGDs, observation, outcome harvesting, contribution analysis or case studies depending on the assignment.

03

Build reliable field systems

We prepare tools, digital forms, consent scripts, enumerator training, supervision protocols and real-time quality checks before full data collection begins.

04

Analyse and triangulate evidence

We integrate quantitative and qualitative findings, assess limitations, compare evidence sources and explain patterns rather than presenting isolated data points.

05

Translate findings into use

We produce concise conclusions, prioritised recommendations, management-response matrices, presentations and learning products that decision-makers can act on.

Methods and tools

Methods may include

Theory of change review OECD-DAC evaluation criteria Household and institutional surveys KIIs and FGDs Observation and facility assessment Contribution analysis Outcome harvesting Most Significant Change stories Data quality assessment Validation workshops
Typical deliverables

Outputs clients can use

Inception report Evaluation matrix Sampling plan Digital and paper-based tools Cleaned dataset and codebook Draft and final evaluation report Presentation deck Learning brief Recommendation and management-response matrix
Questions clients ask

Frequently asked questions.

Can GRC conduct independent endline and final evaluations?

Yes. GRC can lead independent evaluations from inception through fieldwork, analysis, reporting, validation and final presentation.

Can the evaluation use OECD-DAC criteria?

Yes. We regularly structure evaluation designs around relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability, while adding cross-cutting issues such as gender, inclusion, accountability, conflict sensitivity and environmental safeguards where relevant.

Can GRC support both quantitative and qualitative evaluation work?

Yes. Our work can combine survey data, qualitative interviews, focus group discussions, observation, document review, case studies and participatory validation.

Request support

Need monitoring, evaluation and learning support?

Share your terms of reference, concept note or a short description of the assignment. GRC will help you clarify the scope, methodology, work plan and deliverables.

Request a Proposal